Page 26 of 26 FirstFirst ... 16242526
Results 251 to 257 of 257

Thread: F*ck The Children

  1. #251
    Senior Member Zook_e_Pi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On the way to Tiperary (via shortcut through the Tum Tum trees)
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks
    1,340
    Thanked 1,277 Times in 688 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    To further the thought, this abuse of children is really just an aspect of the separation of spaces (or domains, if you will).

    There are three essential domains: the private, the semi-private, and the public. The private offers the most individual freedoms and the public offers the least. The semi-private offers intermediate levels of freedoms. Sexual freedoms and attendant perversions (in a statistical sense) are maximised in the private domains and severely limited in the public domain. At least, this was the arrangement prior to the sexual revolution of the 60s, which was a collection of stepping stones connecting the earlier land of wonderment - and sanitised public domain - of Wally and Theodore Cleaver (The Beaver) to the burgeoning 21st century resurrection of Sodom and Gomorrah.

    Evolution happens at a much slower speed than devolution. The slow-rolling millennial train of progressive memes was always at risk of collision with the half-century train hauling primitive memes and coming from the opposite direction on parallel tracks with logarithmic increments of speed.

    And so, when the social engineers decided to switch the fast train onto the tracks of the slower moving train, sometimes in the late sixties or early seventies ... it was only a matter of time before the 21st century arrived.

    The designed merging of the sloth-paced public domain with the sundry mule-paced semi-private domains ... pushed the mules onto the range and the sloth to the brink of extinction. With so many mules grazing, it wouldn't be long before the cheetah-paced private domains began their prowls.

    To wit, the public domain is no longer a safe space for the slow and the tender. It is now a feeding space for the fast, the hardened, and the consumptive.

    Pax

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Zook_e_Pi For This Useful Post:

    Adam Bomm (06-29-2017)

  3. #252
    Senior Member sjkted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    651
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 911 Times in 406 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-06-2...ansgender.html

    The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is playing with fire by allowing an anonymous author to publish articles on its platform that aim to minimize the utter depravity of pedophilia. Similar to what the far left publication Salon tried to do several years back (along with The New York Times), the BBC seems to agree with this author that pedophilia isn’t necessarily a disorder to be treated with disdain, but rather a sexual orientation like homosexuality that simply requires “help.”

    It wouldn’t be the first time that the BBC has entered the ring on the wrong side of the issue, having once employed a popular television personality by the name of Jimmy Savile who was reported to have sexually abused at least 500 young boys and girls, as well as engaged in necrophilia, or sex with dead bodies.

    The long-haired, odd looking goofball of a man always seemed off to many who knew him, and yet the BBC apparently kept him on its payroll until his death in 2011. Others in the media, including a radio presenter from The Guardian, offered nothing but laud and praise for Savile and his “tireless” philanthropy. But many a discerning individual perceived the ruse as being a cover for Savile’s dark and dirty secret, which the BBC never spoke about or in any way condemned.

    Despite his passing, Savile’s legacy apparently still lives on at the BBC, which is once again giving a platform to the sexually depraved to minimize the evil of illicit adult-child relations. Though the anonymous individual acknowledges pedophilia as wrong, the tone of his (or perhaps her) article actually paints child predators as victims rather than predators. The current societal view of pedophiles, the article maintains, is that those who are “outed” will potentially face “violence” and “physical attacks” – and that this needs to change.

    If pedophilia wasn’t condemned like it is, there would be no need to seek help

    It’s important to note that the unnamed author of this article does admit that he was once a pedophile, and that by seeking help he was able to overcome it. But in condemning the general social response to pedophilia, this author actually contradicts the driving factor behind what drove him to seek help in the first place – the fact that society views pedophilia as being so aberrant to what’s normal and decent that those who practice it require removal from society.

    “It should be noted that the author never hints that acting on the impulse to sexually abuse children is acceptable, and acknowledges that his ‘former orientation’ later led him to seek help, discovering that it is entirely curable,” writes Will Ricciardella for The Daily Caller. “He does not, it appears, understand his own tacit admission: that the condemnation of nefarious and evil sex acts perpetrated on children, rather than social acceptance or acknowledgement of it as a sexual orientation, was the impetus for him to seek help.”

    So what the reader of this BBC article is aimed to be left with is a not-so-subtle sense of guilt over judging pedophiles too harshly when they’re really just victims of a sexual identity crisis that society doesn’t fully understand. And if only more people could see pedophilia as being just another type of gender, perhaps, then maybe it wouldn’t have the horrible stigma it currently does.

    “The author’s theme that pedophilia should not be demonized in order to encourage pedophiles to seek help, precludes the more sensible and rational response that neither are mutually exclusive, and encouraging pedophiles to seek help is the corollary of its condemnation and degree of its perceived moral repugnancy,” Ricciardella adds.
    --sjkted

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to sjkted For This Useful Post:

    Zook_e_Pi (06-28-2017)

  5. #253
    Senior Member Adam Bomm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,622
    Thanks
    2,169
    Thanked 1,099 Times in 809 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    No, Just no...

    Condemnation is just a tool for the authoritarian. It is useless and does nothing but perpetuate the disorder from generation to generation. Giving voice to such issues is critical to uncovering it, understanding it, and to use an unfortunate term, fixing it.

    Yes, it is shocking, outrageous, and contrary to accepted behavioral norms, but it is the only way. One thing that I have recognized though, even the most narcissistic and depraved human being will never admit to necrophilia. So the fact that the person cited in the article is associated with that particular disorder tells me that the designation was not self-ascribed but imposed externally by hysterics. No good can result from hysteria.

  6. #254
    Senior Member Adam Bomm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,622
    Thanks
    2,169
    Thanked 1,099 Times in 809 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    It is outrageous as the title of this thread...You should consider changing it because it is offensive. Really!

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Adam Bomm For This Useful Post:

    Harley (06-29-2017)

  8. #255
    Senior Member Adam Bomm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,622
    Thanks
    2,169
    Thanked 1,099 Times in 809 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    Zook,

    As you say, Pedophilia has always been a 'private' crime. 'Outing' it does not constitute acceptance. It is visceral and instinctively wrong and society will always have an aversion to it. Unless and until we transcend our animal natures. Perhaps, this is one of the areas in which Jung refers to when he says instinctive drives will sometimes operate at cross purposes much to the chagrin of those affected. Heinlein would love to and likely did explore these facets. In my estimation man's higher self as transcendent to animalism would not countenance exploitation of the innocent and naive.

  9. #256
    Senior Member sjkted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    651
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 911 Times in 406 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    A story of man-boy love is now garnering international awards:

    Hollywood has been rocked for months by reports of sexual misconduct, but evidently there is no bad time to release a major motion picture about a gauzy romance between an adult man and a teenage boy.
    The Sony Pictures Classics film “Call Me By Your Name” has been generating Oscar buzz since Monday after picking up three Golden Globe nominations, including one for best motion picture-drama, amid rave reviews.
    The accolades come even though the film’s premise — a relationship between a 17-year-old boy and a 24-year-old man — strikes its detractors as “somewhat creepy” at best and a “pedophile fantasy” at worst.
    Defenders of “Call Me By Your Name” are quick to point out that the love affair is consensual and wouldn’t be illegal, given that the drama takes place in Italy, where the age of consent is 16.
    Does that make it OK? Not to Gabe Hoffman, co-producer of “An Open Secret,” a 2014 documentary about child sexual abuse in Hollywood.



    --sjkted

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to sjkted For This Useful Post:

    Zook_e_Pi (Today)

  11. #257
    Administrator Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,074
    Thanks
    995
    Thanked 1,257 Times in 744 Posts

    Re: F*ck The Children

    Quote Originally Posted by sjkted View Post
    a relationship between a 17-year-old boy and a 24-year-old man — strikes its detractors as “somewhat creepy” at best and a “pedophile fantasy” at worst.
    Yikes, what's the world coming too when a consenting legal adult has a relationship with a consenting legal adult...and portrayed in a film.

    This is an issue, when some try to tie in above example as pedophilla come predatory behaviour comparing it to adults who engage in underage sex with minors. Sex that's groomed and deliberately preyed upon. This is what we call legitimate predatory pedophilla behaviour.

    In my country along with many others, the legal age for consenting sexual relations is 16.

    The term 'somewhat creepy at best' used in a rational example would be a 17 year old and a 40-90 year old...in general terms. But still legal in many countries.

    The term 'pedophile fantasy at worst' is a ridiculous suggestion and frankly stirring the pot and possibly from some PC police type who has some closet homophobia issues and possible religious affiliations.
    Last edited by Ross; Today at 01:11 PM.
    Ross
    ***Fred Coleman, Founding Partner, Beloved Friend***
    who passed away 11/10/2016
    Rest in Peace
    ***

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Ross For This Useful Post:

    Zook_e_Pi (Today)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •