No big surprise as to why Trump was elected ...

[Zook_e_Pi]

The Zionist occupation of America was merely executing the next step in the "Clash of Civilizations" meme.

Either Hilary or Trump could have carried the order and the next step. That said, Trump is more extreme in his sound bytes against Muslims ... and Hilary had become stale compromised bread (Whitewater, email, etc.) in the eyes of the masses who then clamored for a fresh loaf. With those two things working in tandem, it would've been a surprise had Hilary been elected, for Trump is clearly the bankster's preferred candidate. The people's candidate? No such thing. Hasn't been a thing for a long time if ever had been.



Pax

[Ross]

for Trump is clearly the bankster's preferred candidate. The people's candidate? No such thing. Hasn't been a thing for a long time if ever had been.

Perhaps, but I don't see that as a clear-cut preference in terms of the bankster's. I'm picking they assumed Hills was the preferred candidate based on statistical data, albeit data that proved to be out-of-touch, fudged to some degree even.

Banksters/elitists hedge their bets, allowing for several out-comes. They do not have total control in the % ranks as to the possibilities of their preferred out-come. There is always room for doubt and out-side effects, so hedging bets is the logical position.

While in the bigger scheme of things, we know it matters not who wears the POTUS badge, yet the people did vote, and can be called a land-slide of sorts in favour of Trump.

Any current and future plans in the elites arsenal, must be subject to shifts in momentum, sub-direction and general allowance for the less-than-predictable possibilities.

[Adam Bomm]

Gawd!

Uh huh, yep, no doubt about it....

Adam

Seriously, if this is all there is, I'm going back to my original stance...just push the damn button...the world is in dire need of a nuclear cleansing.

[Zook_e_Pi]

Perhaps, but I don't see that as a clear-cut preference in terms of the bankster's. I'm picking they assumed Hills was the preferred candidate based on statistical data, albeit data that proved to be out-of-touch, fudged to some degree even.

I didn't say there was a clearcut preference for one or the other.

But there is extensive evidence to make the clearcut case that both candidates were/are owned - lock stock and barrel - by the Rothschild branded banksters hereon known as the Ziomasonic order.

Banksters/elitists hedge their bets, allowing for several out-comes. They do not have total control in the % ranks as to the possibilities of their preferred out-come. There is always room for doubt and out-side effects, so hedging bets is the logical position.

Hedging bets is just another way of designing false dichotomy. You own both candidates by investing in each of them. Whichever candidate wins does not really matter because you control both when all is said and done. In our particular case, there is also the Clash of Civilizations meme to advance, and Trump clearly gives the puppetmasters some cachet as President (e.g. his extremist views on Muslims expressing as an electoral majority, Diebold machines notwithstanding). That sorta thing. If Hillary had won, the elites would not have lost there either, but they would have had to work harder to implement the Clash of Civilizations meme. So Trump is the preferred candidate from the point of view of the designers of worldpolitik and their push for a new Ziomasonic order ... the Clash of Civilizations is the next big deception they are attempting to pull off. And they will succeed as long as people are willing to accommodate the meme.

While in the bigger scheme of things, we know it matters not who wears the POTUS badge, yet the people did vote, and can be called a land-slide of sorts in favour of Trump.
Any current and future plans in the elites arsenal, must be subject to shifts in momentum, sub-direction and general allowance for the less-than-predictable possibilities.

The branded people did indeed vote. Unfortunately, over 90% of the masses are branded. The meek will thus inherit the Earth ... unless, of course, the courageous step forward and fight the deceptions and mendacity that constitute the foundation of the Ziomasonic power pyramid. This is where critical mass in awareness is crucial, for without it the branding will become permanent.

That said, I'm not branded. You can take that to a nonRothschild bank and deposit it!

Question begs, how many of you out there who currently inhabit these forums consider yourself nonbranded ... but are then betrayed by your questionable discernments, surface observations, and effortless accommodations of the Ziomasonic power pyramid and its memes and schemes?

Mind you, being branded is not a sin ... but it does point to the unremarkable middle ground above the sinners and below the saints. And it's quite unfortunate that the human condition is overwhelmingly mediocre as of 2017. A well-sculpted rock chiseled by sandblasts, smoothed by waterflows, and cured in the hot sun has a more interesting life story than the average human DNA experiment. Even the sinners surrender a more compelling account of having lived a life than anyone that casts a vote in quadrennial appointments mistakenly thought to be elections.

The human condition will never advance as long as the uninformed brandish a vote. That's a truism that goes against individual liberty, true enough, but it's as real as the morning sky. We can't reject truisms. We shouldn't reject individual liberty. So we are left with the task of identifying and admonishing ignorance. That much we can do and must.

To that point, swallowing the Ziomasonic swill that consistently portrays the independence of politicians (e.g. Trump, Hilary, Obama, etc.) and consistently reports considerable differences between politicians - when there are no such beasts - is an act of ignorance. They are all cut from the same sociopath cloth of power-seeking megalomaniacs willing to prostrate themselves before the rule of a sociopathic power pyramid. <-------------- you can take that to a nonRothschild bank and deposit it!

So why extend anything to these monkeys other than utmost contempt?



Pax

[Ross]

Trump is clearly the bankster's preferred candidate.

No you didn't say it was clear-cut but it was referenced from your statement above.

But there is extensive evidence to make the clearcut case that both candidates were/are owned - lock stock and barrel

Yes indeed they are! Trump in thick with the zionist/Israeli mandate. Hills a little less on the public radar but pro Israeli all the same.

You own both candidates by investing in each of them. Whichever candidate wins does not really matter because you control both when all is said and done.

Yup but again I say...

They do not have total control in the % ranks as to the possibilities of their preferred out-come. There is always room for doubt and out-side effects, so hedging bets is the logical position.

Not all goes to plan, not all pans out...as to their preferred direction.

Any current and future plans in the elites arsenal, must be subject to shifts in momentum, sub-direction and general allowance for the less-than-predictable possibilities.

[Adam Bomm]

I was just reading over on Avalon...Here's the going theory on the Mosque attack in Quebec.

Theory 1: It was competing Islamists that shot them up.
Theory 2: It was a false flag to gin up support for Muslims (but they are all terrorists anyway)
Theory 3: It was probably the world controllers trying to sow more chaos and unrest.

Is anything missing?

As for Trump, somethings just need not be said.

the lone alternative viewer, Adam

[Ross]

I was just reading over on Avalon...Here's the going theory on the Mosque attack in Quebec.

Theory 1: It was competing Islamists that shot them up.
Theory 2: It was a false flag to gin up support for Muslims (but they are all terrorists anyway)
Theory 3: It was probably the world controllers trying to sow more chaos and unrest.

Is anything missing?

As for Trump, somethings just need not be said.

the lone alternative viewer, Adam

Or-Theory 4: It was someone or pair, young, with a confused, angry, unintelligent demeanor, inflicting their murderess behaviour onto innocents.

[Adam Bomm]

Or-Theory 4: It was someone or pair, young, with a confused, angry, unintelligent demeanor, inflicting their murderess behaviour onto innocents.

yesss!!! that was the one missing.

Adamm